As the conversation around Measure T intensifies, opponents saying "No on T" have raised concerns that approving it will lead to increased traffic, pollution, and even higher taxes. However, these claims are based on misunderstandings or oversimplifications of what Measure T is designed to do. Let’s break down these myths and explain why Measure T is a smart, forward-thinking approach to addressing our community’s housing needs—without causing these negative impacts.
Myth 1: No on T Says That Measure T Will Create More Traffic in San Mateo
One of the most common arguments against Measure T is that it will worsen traffic congestion in San Mateo by allowing more housing development. In reality, Measure T focuses on building affordable housing along transit corridors, precisely where traffic impact can be minimized. These areas are much better suited for growth, with access to public transportation as a key component, versus integrating additional residents where they have to drive. By placing new homes near transit lines, we reduce the number of cars on the road because residents have more options for getting to work, school, or other activities without relying on personal vehicles.
Research consistently shows that people who live near transit are far more likely to use public transportation, walk, or bike, reducing the overall burden on local roadways. Measure T also promotes smart growth policies, which ensure that housing is built where it makes the most sense—close to existing infrastructure—rather than expanding into suburban or rural areas that would require new roads and add to traffic congestion.
Myth 2: No on T Says That Measure T Will Increase Pollution
Another argument is that Measure T will contribute to environmental degradation, particularly in terms of air pollution. Again, this claim doesn’t hold up when you examine the details. By focusing development along transit corridors, Measure T reduces car dependency, which is one of the leading causes of pollution in cities.
Building housing near public transit allows more people to use buses, trains, and other forms of environmentally friendly transportation. This reduces greenhouse gas emissions and helps mitigate the impacts of climate change. Additionally, by building in already developed areas, Measure T prevents urban sprawl, which would require cutting into green spaces and potentially increase pollution through long-distance commutes. If you say No on T, there will be an increase in population across neighborhoods.
Measure T is also aligned with the state’s broader environmental goals, particularly California’s commitment to reducing carbon emissions. The measure promotes higher-density housing in areas that are well-serviced by public transit, making it easier for residents to live sustainably without relying on cars for every trip.
Myth 3: No on T Says That Measure T Will Raise Taxes
Opponents have also argued that Measure T will result in higher taxes for residents. This is a misunderstanding of how the measure works. Measure T does not impose any new taxes or require additional revenue from local residents. Instead, it builds upon the City’s existing Below Market Rate (BMR) ordinance, which ensures that developers set aside a portion of new housing units as affordable.
The funding mechanisms for affordable housing already exist within San Mateo’s framework, including developer contributions and other financial tools. Measure T continues this approach by guiding how housing is developed, but it does not place a new financial burden on taxpayers. In fact, the measure is designed to protect taxpayers by ensuring that new developments are financially sustainable and that affordable housing needs are met without increasing taxes.
Moreover, affordable housing has long-term economic benefits for the entire community. By providing homes for essential workers—teachers, healthcare providers, first responders—we can help reduce turnover, stabilize local services, and keep more money circulating within the local economy. This, in turn, benefits local businesses and makes the community more resilient without placing additional strain on public funds.
The No on T San Mateo crowd has been focusing on fear around these three myths for long enough. The reality is that Measure T promotes smart, sustainable growth that will reduce car dependency, cut emissions, and ensure that San Mateo remains a welcoming place for people of all income levels. A zoning change is not going to fix five decades of car dependency, but it IS going to support our community in beginning the process of designing for a more sustainable and car independent future. This measure is a step toward a more inclusive, environmentally friendly, and economically stable future for our community.
By voting Yes on Measure T, we can address the housing crisis while protecting the things we love most about San Mateo. Let’s move forward with solutions, not fear.
Read Next: 10 Reasons to Vote Yes on Measure T
コメント